Dave,
Just wanted to reiterate that I would probably have saved $100s of dollars if I'd simply said replace my old hydraulic hose with a new hydraulic hose. It appears that what you're describing as a workable solution is no longer a plastic hose (which cost me $100s of dollars more) but another hydraulic hose. Is that right?
If it is, then its very important that anyone getting a CAT shop to do this work specific that replacement with a hydraulic hose is OK!
In my case evidently the Portland, Oregon CAT shop acquired a hydraulic hose, but then the manager informed them "NO it's to be a plastic hose that the customer requested", so evidently I wound up purchasing both (numerous fittings on my bill) including the time to acquire same.
I wish I had known $760 ago that a new hydraulic hose was acceptable - it just didn't dawn on me that since my existing hydraulic hose had lasted since 1998 with no ill effects that a new one would be fine. That was just poor thinking on my part, I guess. But then again who knew that the same hose made of plastic would cost me 100s of dollars more?
Mike